Hmmm. How can I follow Julia Donaldson with sage advice on picture books? Obviously I can’t…I know! I’ll use my best diversionary tactic and tell a rude story.
Did you know that there’s an old biscuit tin that collectors will pay a great deal of money to get hold of? It was made in the 1970s by Huntley and Palmer and it shows a charming Edwardian village scene – except that its designer was so fed up with his fee he sabotaged it and hid several characters in the background doing…ahem…extremely rude things.
Inspired by this, my blog today is a blatant attempt to create a lucrative collector’s market for children’s picture books that include embarrassing mistakes. Hey, every little helps these days, and many authors will have lots of old complimentary book copies kicking around the attic. Most of these are likely to be foreign language translations, admittedly, but there might be one or two with a continuity error in them, fit for collectors of dodgy biscuit tins, wonky stamps and the like. These things happen, even in children’s books. My personal examples come from the early 1980s, before computer systems took over the publishing process, making it easier and much cheaper to catch and correct errors before the printing presses rolled.
When I got my first job as a tea-making junior editor, a publishing colleague turned out to be so fed up that he’d lost the will to function at his desk. It was down to him to create a Disney board book featuring cartoon ducks Hewey, Dewey and Lewey. Nobody checked his work, so when thousands of the books were printed there was no ending to the story, It finished on an ‘and’. The weirdest thing was that nobody ever wrote in to complain. I expect to see it on the Antiques Roadshow any time soon.
On a photographic board book the same employee failed to spot a difficult feature on a photo of a young horse – a very excited young horse, shall we say. We had thick files of complaint letters on that one. By that time the editor in question had left to become a vicar, where I hope he concentrated harder.
As a newbie I was put in charge of innumerable colouring and dot-to-dot books, featuring various different licensed characters of the time. Each book had to have a legally correct imprint detailing the copyright owners – large and potentially litigious companies such as Walt Disney or DC Thompson. Printed advances went to these companies to be checked and signed off, and if anything was wrong, costly pulping of many books might follow. Imagine my panic when I accidentally got the copyright details mixed up on a couple of books and it looked as if DC Thompson owned Mickey Mouse and Disney owned Bananaman!The horror!
What to do? Luckily the young man responsible for sending out the advances could be taken into my confidence and persuaded to ‘forget’ to send them, so nobody noticed.
How much persuading? Well, it’s probably time I gave this blog a little more class and so, as they say in the very best books…Reader, I married him!
As an author you can’t control the mistakes of editors or illustrators but you can make sure you don’t start by leaving a gaping continuity hole in your work, by reading through it and getting someone else to read through it before you send it off. Then - and I know this all sounds obvious - but it really is vital to very carefully check any proofs that come back to you, just in case you’ve mentioned somebody who wears a red bowtie and he’s now wearing a blue cravat but nobody has noticed.
PS: On a non-picture book note, a company I worked for published a recipe book by a newly-celebrated young chef who went on to become a big celebrity. But somehow or other his quantities weren’t printed accurately and the book recipes were a disaster. Cue more files full of letters and a costly reprint. I’d better not point to his identity in any manner. After all, now we are all in another season… but there are two clues in this paragraph. Once you have solved it, it will be time to go and check your biscuit tins.
14 comments:
I've had errors in some of my books but thankfully no letters have arrived, so it would appear no one noticed. I did catch one error in one of my picture books. Something mentioned in the story had to appear on the second spread. Thankfully when the proofs came through I noticed it and the illustrator had just enough room to squeeze it in. P.S. Would love to see the top of the biscuit tin - although aware this is not the place!
I enjoyed your blog, Moira, and I was so intrigued I googled the naughty biscuit tin!
Yes, in picture books, Children really do notice a lack of continuity in the pictures and when the words and pictures are at odds. We adults are so busy concentrating on the words, we seldom notice. Last month a class of children spotted something missing in the background of one of my books that none of us had noticed.
Ah but some of us know who that incredibly famous chef is!
Thanks for making me smile, Moira. Yes, it's important to check the proofs-I haven't had any big issues, just a slight mix up over dinosaur names and markings and a surreal exchange involving jewelry worn by mum and small girl dragon. Some bits are noticeably absent in most picture book animals, bringing into question their potential to breed, but that's all part of the charm and delight of picture books :-)
I hasten to add, for any lawyers reading this, that he is plainly a most competent person...!
That wasn't a problem on the photo board book mentioned in the blog...I don't think that one is going to make it onto a prime time antiques show any time soon.
I have had a couple of emails from artist friends this morning, admitting to building biscuit tin style revenge details into books they were doing for really awkward bad publishers - using photoshop to make things microscopic. Now I'm wondering what worm can I've opened here!
I have found that you have to be careful with tails in illustrations - they can easily be misinterpreted.
Highly enjoyable post.
Rather shamefully a glaringly-obvious (once you know about it) mistake made it through proof reads of my picture book You Choose which is only twelve sentences long! The publisher rang me up to apologise, so I went and re-read the book and couldn't see it because, of course, I was reading what I expected to read. But any first edition, hardback, version of You Choose says 'to to' on the what job you'd like to have page. I hope that makes them incredibly valuable, but have seen no sign of it.
A lovely post.
Oh Moira - for shame!! You titillate and then don't show us the complete biscuit tin lid - WHERE CAN I SEE? I won't sleep tonight for erotic fantasies and naughties going on in one of those nice English villages.
It's all on the internet, Enid...But be careful what you put in your search! Moira
Aha! We love your book in our house, but we don't have a mistake version so we can't cash in.
I really enjoyed your foray into secrets
I have a picturebook example: one of the creatures was missing from a well-known artist's roughs. The book only went up to number 10 and the creatures were quite big, so it's both surprising that he/she (I'm giving away no names) provided one less than needed, and not surprising that I spotted the omission.
On the hand, had I been required to proof-read a Where's Wally? illustrated biscuit tin...
Isabel Marant Flat
(dsf2012.4.26)
Post a Comment